Claude Mythos 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
Too close to call on our weighted score (Claude Mythos 5 36, Claude Fable 5.1 36). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Mythos 5
36/100- ECI—
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
- Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1
36/100- ECI164.8
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Claude Mythos 5 36/100, Claude Fable 5.1 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Mythos 5 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceClaude Mythos 5 $20.00 · Claude Fable 5.1 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameClaude Mythos 5 1,000,000 · Claude Fable 5.1 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Mythos 5: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Fable 5.1: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Mythos 5 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 0 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 36/100 | 36/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Mythos 5Anthropic | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 164.8 |
| ECI rank | — | #4 of 148 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 90.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 100% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 70.8% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $50.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.25 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $20.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | claude-fable-5-1 |
| API providers | 2 | 29 (best) |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2026 | Jun 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Mythos 5$200.00
- Claude Fable 5.1$200.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Mythos 5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Claude Mythos 5 36/100, Claude Fable 5.1 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Mythos 5 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Claude Mythos 5 or Claude Fable 5.1?
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 cost the same: $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Claude Mythos 5 has not been scored yet and Claude Fable 5.1 has an ECI of 164.8.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Claude Mythos 5 up to 128,000, Claude Fable 5.1 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Mythos 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Fable 5.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Mythos 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the newest, released Sep 1, 2026. Claude Mythos 5 came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Mythos 5 Jan 31, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 Jun 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT-5.6 CyberThree-way comparison
- Claude Mythos 5 vs GPT-5.6 CyberOpenAI
- Claude Mythos 5 vs Fugu UltraSakana AI
- Claude Mythos 5 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B ITGoogle
- Claude Mythos 5 vs MAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoft
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · ECI 166.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 157.6
