ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73, Muse Spark 1.1 70, Kimi K2.6 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.6

    Released Apr 21, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI151.1
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
  3. Google

    Gemini 3.6 Flash

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$0.75 / $3.75
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73/100, Muse Spark 1.1 70/100, Kimi K2.6 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.6 Flash for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 3.6 FlashCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 · Muse Spark 1.1 154.3 · Kimi K2.6 151.1
  • Lowest priceGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 · Kimi K2.6 $1.71 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMuse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · Kimi K2.6 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Kimi K2.6: Text, Images, Video · Gemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.6Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Spark 1.1Kimi K2.6Gemini 3.6 Flash
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%847984
Price25%363942
Inputs & features15%9080100
Context window10%613761
Overall100%70/10065/10073/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.1MetaKimi K2.6Moonshot AIGemini 3.6 FlashGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.3151.1154.3 (best)
ECI rank#35 of 148#45 of 148#34 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—90.8%94.1% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—57.2%59.0% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—96.1% (best)94.2%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues—76.7%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions57.8%34.9%66.2% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.95$0.75 (best)
Output$4.25$4.00$3.75 (best)
Cached input$0.15$0.16$0.075 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.00$1.71$1.50 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Meta APIOfficial Moonshot AI APIOfficial Google API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoYesYesYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhighYesYesminimal · low · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDmuse-spark-1.1kimi-k2.6gemini-3.6-flash
API providers1346 (best)25
ReleasedJul 9, 2026Apr 21, 2026Jul 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Jan 2025Mar 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
  • Kimi K2.6$17.50
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73/100, Muse Spark 1.1 70/100, Kimi K2.6 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.6 Flash for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price); Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.6 Flash versus $1.71 for Kimi K2.6 (1.1× as much) and $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 (#34 of 148), Muse Spark 1.1 154.3 (#35 of 148) and Kimi K2.6 151.1 (#45 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (152.6–156.3 vs 152.2–157.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.6 Flash 66.2%, Muse Spark 1.1 57.8%, Kimi K2.6 34.9%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.6 Flash leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Kimi K2.6. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072, Kimi K2.6 up to 262,144, Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Kimi K2.6 accepts text, images and video; Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.6 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Muse Spark 1.1 and Gemini 3.6 Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026; Kimi K2.6 came out Apr 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.6 Jan 2025, Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.