ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Muse Glimmer 30B comes out ahead, 57 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Glimmer 30B

    Released Aug 10, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Muse Glimmer 30B

  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.5-Pro

    Released Apr 22, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.435 / $0.87
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Muse Glimmer 30B is our pick

Muse Glimmer 30B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMuse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B $0.525 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro 1,048,576 · Muse Glimmer 30B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Glimmer 30BMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Price50%6362
Inputs & features30%7035
Context window20%2461
Overall100%57/10054/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Glimmer 30BMetaMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30 (best)$0.435
Output$1.20$0.87 (best)
Cached input—$0.0036
Blended (3:1)$0.525 (best)$0.544
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 10 providersOfficial Xiaomi API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID—mimo-v2.5-pro
API providers1220 (best)
ReleasedAug 10, 2026Apr 22, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 4, 2026Dec 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Glimmer 30B$5.40
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro$6.09
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Glimmer 30B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Muse Glimmer 30B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B versus $0.544 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Muse Glimmer 30B has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Glimmer 30B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B. Maximum output per response: Muse Glimmer 30B up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.5-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Glimmer 30B accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts text. Muse Glimmer 30B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Muse Glimmer 30B is the newest, released Aug 10, 2026. MiMo-V2.5-Pro came out Apr 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Muse Glimmer 30B Jan 4, 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons