Mistral Small 4 vs Mistral Small 3.2 vs Hy3 preview
Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Small 3.2 64, Mistral Small 4 64, Hy3 preview 56). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context256K
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2
64/100- ECI131.7
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context128K
Tencent
Hy3 preview
56/100- ECI—
- Price$0.176 / $0.586
- Context256K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Mistral Small 3.2 64/100, Mistral Small 4 64/100, Hy3 preview 56/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.2 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMistral Small 3.2Mistral Small 3.2 $0.15 · Mistral Small 4 $0.263 · Hy3 preview $0.279 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Small 4 and Hy3 previewMistral Small 4 256,000 · Hy3 preview 256,000 · Mistral Small 3.2 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Small 4 and Mistral Small 3.2Mistral Small 4: Text, Images · Mistral Small 3.2: Text, Images · Hy3 preview: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Small 4 | Mistral Small 3.2 | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 77 | 89 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 24 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 64/100 | 56/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 131.7 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #123 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 49.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 30.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.10 (best) | $0.176 |
| Output | $0.60 | $0.30 (best) | $0.586 |
| Cached input | $0.015 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 | $0.15 (best) | $0.279 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Mistral API | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens | 64,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeshigh | No | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | mistral-small-2603 | mistral-small-2506 | hy3-preview |
| API providers | 16 (best) | 6 | 5 |
| Released | Mar 16, 2026 | Jun 20, 2025 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2025 | Mar 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Mistral Small 4$2.70
Mistral Small 3.2$1.60
Hy3 preview$2.93
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Small 4, Mistral Small 3.2 or Hy3 preview?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Mistral Small 3.2 64/100, Mistral Small 4 64/100, Hy3 preview 56/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.2 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 4, Mistral Small 3.2 or Hy3 preview?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Hy3 preview costs $0.176 input / $0.586 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Tencent TokenHub). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Mistral Small 3.2 versus $0.263 for Mistral Small 4 (1.8× as much) and $0.279 for Hy3 preview (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Small 4 has not been scored yet, Mistral Small 3.2 has an ECI of 131.7 and Hy3 preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Small 4, Mistral Small 3.2 and Hy3 preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small 4 and Hy3 preview have the largest context windows (256,000 and 256,000 tokens), against 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2. Maximum output per response: Mistral Small 4 up to 256,000, Mistral Small 3.2 up to 16,384, Hy3 preview up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Small 4 accepts text and images; Mistral Small 3.2 accepts text and images; Hy3 preview accepts text. Mistral Small 4 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Hy3 preview is the newest, released Apr 20, 2026. Mistral Small 4 came out Mar 16, 2026; Mistral Small 3.2 came out Jun 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 4 Jun 2025, Mistral Small 3.2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.