Mistral Nemotron vs Seed 1.6 Vision
Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed 1.6 Vision 63, Mistral Nemotron 62). The right pick depends on what you value most.
NVIDIAMistral Nemotron
62/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context128K
ByteDance SeedSeed 1.6 Vision
63/100- ECI—
- Price$0.119 / $1.19
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Seed 1.6 Vision 63/100, Mistral Nemotron 62/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemotron on price and Seed 1.6 Vision for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMistral NemotronMistral Nemotron Free · Seed 1.6 Vision $0.386 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 1.6 VisionSeed 1.6 Vision 256,000 · Mistral Nemotron 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 1.6 VisionMistral Nemotron: Text · Seed 1.6 Vision: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMistral NemotronPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Nemotron | Seed 1.6 Vision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 69 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 62/100 | 63/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Mistral NemotronNVIDIA | Seed 1.6 VisionByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | Free (best) | $0.119 |
| Output | Free (best) | $1.19 |
| Cached input | — | $0.024 |
| Blended (3:1) | Free (best) | $0.386 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.178 / $2.37 |
| Price source | Official Nvidia API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mistralai/mistral-nemotron | doubao-seed-1-6-vision-250815 |
| API providers | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Jun 11, 2025 | Aug 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Mistral NemotronFree
- Seed 1.6 Vision$3.56
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Nemotron or Seed 1.6 Vision?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Seed 1.6 Vision 63/100, Mistral Nemotron 62/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemotron on price and Seed 1.6 Vision for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemotron or Seed 1.6 Vision?
Mistral Nemotron is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Seed 1.6 Vision costs $0.119 input / $1.19 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Mistral Nemotron is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Mistral Nemotron has not been scored yet and Seed 1.6 Vision has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Nemotron and Seed 1.6 Vision yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 1.6 Vision has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Nemotron. Maximum output per response: Mistral Nemotron up to 8,192, Seed 1.6 Vision up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Nemotron accepts text; Seed 1.6 Vision accepts text and images. Seed 1.6 Vision handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mistral Nemotron publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 1.6 Vision is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 1.6 Vision is the newest, released Aug 15, 2025. Mistral Nemotron came out Jun 11, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
