Mistral Large 3 vs Nova 2 Lite vs Seed 2.0 Lite
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 62 and 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
Amazon
Nova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
- Our pick
ByteDance Seed
Seed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Nova 2 Lite (62) and Mistral Large 3 (50). It leads on price. Nova 2 Lite wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 2.0 LiteSeed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Nova 2 Lite $0.935 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteMistral Large 3: Text, Images · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMistral Large 3Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Mistral Large 3 | Nova 2 Lite | Seed 2.0 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 56 | 51 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 60 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 62/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.50 | $0.33 | $0.089 (best) |
| Output | $1.50 | $2.75 | $0.534 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.05 | $0.083 | $0.018 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.935 | $0.20 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yeslow · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mistral-large-2512 | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 2 | 6 |
| Released | Dec 2, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Nov 2024 | Oct 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Mistral Large 3$8.00
Nova 2 Lite$8.80
Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mistral Large 3, Nova 2 Lite or Seed 2.0 Lite?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Nova 2 Lite (62) and Mistral Large 3 (50). It leads on price. Nova 2 Lite wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3, Nova 2 Lite or Seed 2.0 Lite?
Seed 2.0 Lite is cheaper at $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Nova 2 Lite costs $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Lite versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (3.7× as much) and $0.935 for Nova 2 Lite (4.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet, Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 3, Nova 2 Lite and Seed 2.0 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Mistral Large 3 and 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Mistral Large 3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite and Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025; Nova 2 Lite came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024, Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.