ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Large 2.1 vs Nemotron VoiceChat vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Nemotron VoiceChat comes out ahead, 65 to 35 and 26 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 2.1

    Released Nov 18, 2024

    26/100
    • ECI128.5
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Nemotron VoiceChat

    Released Mar 16, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

    Released Sep 17, 2024

    35/100
    • ECI128.5
    • Price$0.70 / $2.80
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Nemotron VoiceChat is our pick

Nemotron VoiceChat is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (35) and Mistral Large 2.1 (26). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNemotron VoiceChatNemotron VoiceChat Free · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct $1.23 · Mistral Large 2.1 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral Large 2.1 and Qwen2.5 32B InstructMistral Large 2.1 131,072 · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct 131,072 · Nemotron VoiceChat 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron VoiceChatMistral Large 2.1: Text · Nemotron VoiceChat: Text, Audio · Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Large 2.1Nemotron VoiceChatQwen2.5 32B Instruct
Price50%2710046
Inputs & features30%253525
Context window20%242424
Overall100%26/10065/10035/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large 2.1 vs Nemotron VoiceChat vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Large 2.1Mistral AINemotron VoiceChatNVIDIAQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)128.5—128.5
ECI rank#130 of 148 (best)—#131 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions51.3% (best)—46.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.8% (best)—7.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00Free (best)$0.70
Output$6.00Free (best)$2.80
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00Free (best)$1.23
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Nvidia APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens (best)8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDmistral-large-2411nvidia/nemotron-voicechatqwen2-5-32b-instruct
API providers2 (best)11
ReleasedNov 18, 2024Mar 16, 2026Sep 17, 2024
Knowledge cutoffNov 2024—Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large 2.1$32.00
  • Nemotron VoiceChatFree
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct$12.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large 2.1, Nemotron VoiceChat or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nemotron VoiceChat is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Qwen2.5 32B Instruct (35) and Mistral Large 2.1 (26). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 2.1, Nemotron VoiceChat or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Nemotron VoiceChat is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Nvidia API price). Qwen2.5 32B Instruct costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Mistral Large 2.1 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Nemotron VoiceChat is listed as free.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mistral Large 2.1 has an ECI of 128.5, Nemotron VoiceChat has not been scored yet and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has an ECI of 128.5.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 2.1, Nemotron VoiceChat and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 2.1 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Nemotron VoiceChat. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 2.1 up to 16,384, Nemotron VoiceChat up to 8,192, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large 2.1 accepts text; Nemotron VoiceChat accepts text and audio; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct accepts text. Nemotron VoiceChat handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Nemotron VoiceChat is the newest, released Mar 16, 2026. Mistral Large 2.1 came out Nov 18, 2024; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct came out Sep 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 2.1 Nov 2024, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.