ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Large 2.1 vs Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 40, Mistral Large 2.1 38, Mixtral 8x7B 37). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 2.1

    Released Nov 18, 2024

    38/100
    • ECI128.5
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x7B

    Released Dec 11, 2023

    37/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.70 / $0.70
    • Context32K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

    Released Sep 19, 2024

    40/100
    • ECI129.0
    • Price$1.40 / $5.60
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 40/100, Mistral Large 2.1 38/100, Mixtral 8x7B 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for raw capability and Mixtral 8x7B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen2.5 72B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 129.0 · Mistral Large 2.1 128.5 · Mixtral 8x7B 118.5
  • Lowest priceMixtral 8x7BMixtral 8x7B $0.70 · Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $2.45 · Mistral Large 2.1 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMistral Large 2.1 and Qwen2.5 72B InstructMistral Large 2.1 131,072 · Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 131,072 · Mixtral 8x7B 32,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsMistral Large 2.1: Text · Mixtral 8x7B: Text · Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Large 2.1Mixtral 8x7BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%513852
Price25%275731
Inputs & features15%252525
Context window10%24024
Overall100%38/10037/10040/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Large 2.1 vs Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Large 2.1Mistral AIMixtral 8x7BMistral AIQwen2.5 72B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)128.5118.5129.0 (best)
ECI rank#130 of 148#142 of 148#128 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions51.3% (best)30.6%49.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.8%—8.1% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.70 (best)$1.40
Output$6.00$0.70 (best)$5.60
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.70 (best)$2.45
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)32,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens32,000 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDmistral-large-2411open-mixtral-8x7bqwen2-5-72b-instruct
API providers2 (best)11
ReleasedNov 18, 2024Dec 11, 2023Sep 19, 2024
Knowledge cutoffNov 2024Jan 2024Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Large 2.1$32.00
  • Mixtral 8x7B$8.40
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$25.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Large 2.1, Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 40/100, Mistral Large 2.1 38/100, Mixtral 8x7B 37/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for raw capability and Mixtral 8x7B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 2.1, Mixtral 8x7B or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $1.40 input / $5.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Mistral Large 2.1 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for Mixtral 8x7B versus $2.45 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (3.5× as much) and $3.00 for Mistral Large 2.1 (4.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 129.0 (#128 of 148), Mistral Large 2.1 128.5 (#130 of 148) and Mixtral 8x7B 118.5 (#142 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (123.8–130.7 vs 123.8–130.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Large 2.1 51.3%, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 49.2%, Mixtral 8x7B 30.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Large 2.1, Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 2.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 32,000 for Mixtral 8x7B. Maximum output per response: Mistral Large 2.1 up to 16,384, Mixtral 8x7B up to 32,000, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Large 2.1 accepts text; Mixtral 8x7B accepts text; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Mistral Large 2.1 is the newest, released Nov 18, 2024. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct came out Sep 19, 2024; Mixtral 8x7B came out Dec 11, 2023. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 2.1 Nov 2024, Mixtral 8x7B Jan 2024, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.