ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Ministral 8B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B comes out ahead, 54 to 42 on our weighted score, though Ministral 8B Instruct is 47% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Ministral 8B Instruct

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI127.5
    • Price$0.229 / $0.436
    • Context128K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is our pick

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Ministral 8B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityMistral Small 3.1 24BShared benchmarks: Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5% · Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%
  • Lowest priceMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.281 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Small 3.1 24BMinistral 8B Instruct: Text · Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMinistral 8B InstructMistral Small 3.1 24B
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%2747
Price25%8976
Inputs & features15%2560
Context window10%2424
Overall100%42/10054/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Ministral 8B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B specifications side by side
SpecificationMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIMistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—127.5
ECI rank—#132 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions27.2%47.5% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—5.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.229
Output$0.15 (best)$0.436
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.281
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenMistral Research LicenseOpen
API model ID——
API providers12 (best)
ReleasedOct 16, 2024Mar 17, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
  • Mistral Small 3.1 24B$3.16
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Ministral 8B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Ministral 8B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.229 input / $0.436 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Ministral 8B Instruct versus $0.281 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5% and Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 8B Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Small 3.1 24B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Maximum output per response: Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Mistral Small 3.1 24B up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Mistral Small 3.1 24B accepts text and images. Mistral Small 3.1 24B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the newest, released Mar 17, 2025. Ministral 8B Instruct came out Oct 16, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 3.1 24B Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.