Ministral 8B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B comes out ahead, 54 to 42 on our weighted score, though Ministral 8B Instruct is 47% cheaper per token.
Mistral AI
Ministral 8B Instruct
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
- Our pick
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
54/100- ECI127.5
- Price$0.229 / $0.436
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is our pick
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Ministral 8B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityMistral Small 3.1 24BShared benchmarks: Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5% · Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%
- Lowest priceMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.281 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Small 3.1 24BMinistral 8B Instruct: Text · Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 8B Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 24B |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 27 | 47 |
| Price | 25% | 89 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 60 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 54/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 127.5 |
| ECI rank | — | #132 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 27.2% | 47.5% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 5.8% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.229 |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.436 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $0.281 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenMistral Research License | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Oct 16, 2024 | Mar 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$3.16
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (42). It leads on capability and inputs & features. Ministral 8B Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?
Ministral 8B Instruct is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.229 input / $0.436 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Ministral 8B Instruct versus $0.281 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5% and Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Small 3.1 24B 47.5%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 8B Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Small 3.1 24B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Maximum output per response: Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Mistral Small 3.1 24B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Mistral Small 3.1 24B accepts text and images. Mistral Small 3.1 24B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the newest, released Mar 17, 2025. Ministral 8B Instruct came out Oct 16, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Small 3.1 24B Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.