Ministral 8B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo
Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Nemo 43, Ministral 8B Instruct 42). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIMinistral 8B Instruct
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
- Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo
43/100- ECI118.7
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Nemo 43/100, Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability, Ministral 8B Instruct on price and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityMistral NemoShared benchmarks: Mistral Nemo 29.9% · Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%
- Lowest priceSame priceMinistral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Mistral Nemo $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 8B InstructMinistral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Mistral Nemo 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMinistral 8B Instruct: Text · Mistral Nemo: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 8B Instruct | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 27 | 30 |
| Price | 25% | 89 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 43/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ministral 8B InstructMistral AI | Mistral NemoMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 118.7 |
| ECI rank | — | #140 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 27.2% | 29.9% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenMistral Research License | Open |
| API model ID | — | mistral-nemo |
| API providers | 1 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Oct 16, 2024 | Jul 1, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jul 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
- Mistral Nemo$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Nemo?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Mistral Nemo 43/100, Ministral 8B Instruct 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Nemo for raw capability, Ministral 8B Instruct on price and Ministral 8B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because Ministral 8B Instruct has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B Instruct or Mistral Nemo?
Ministral 8B Instruct and Mistral Nemo cost the same: $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): Mistral Nemo 29.9% and Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Nemo 29.9%, Ministral 8B Instruct 27.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 8B Instruct and Mistral Nemo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Nemo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 8B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Nemo. Maximum output per response: Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Mistral Nemo up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Mistral Nemo accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Ministral 8B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 16, 2024. Mistral Nemo came out Jul 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Nemo Jul 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Llama-3.1-8B-InstructThree-way comparison
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Gemma 3 4B ITGoogle · ECI 116.1
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Phi-4-miniMicrosoft
- Mistral Nemo vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
- Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
