Ministral 3B vs Ministral 14B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 14B 64, Ministral 3B 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Mistral AIMinistral 3B
61/100- ECI118.1
- Price$0.10 / $0.10
- Context128K
- Mistral AI
Ministral 14B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.20
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Ministral 14B 64/100, Ministral 3B 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3B on price and Ministral 14B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMinistral 3BMinistral 3B $0.10 · Ministral 14B $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 14BMinistral 14B 262,144 · Ministral 3B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMinistral 14BMinistral 3B: Text · Ministral 14B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 3B | Ministral 14B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 97 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 64/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ministral 3BMistral AI | Ministral 14BMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 118.1 | — |
| ECI rank | #144 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 25.3% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Oct 16, 2024 | Dec 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ministral 3B$1.20
- Ministral 14B$2.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 3B or Ministral 14B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Ministral 14B 64/100, Ministral 3B 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3B on price and Ministral 14B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3B or Ministral 14B?
Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Ministral 14B costs $0.20 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.10 per million tokens for Ministral 3B versus $0.20 for Ministral 14B (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Ministral 3B has an ECI of 118.1 and Ministral 14B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 3B and Ministral 14B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 14B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Ministral 3B. Maximum output per response: Ministral 3B up to 8,192, Ministral 14B up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 3B accepts text; Ministral 14B accepts text and images. Ministral 14B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Ministral 14B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Ministral 3B came out Oct 16, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Ministral 3B Mar 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Llama-3.1-8B-InstructThree-way comparison
- Ministral 3B vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
- Ministral 3B vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Ministral 3B vs Gemma 3 4B ITGoogle · ECI 116.1
- Ministral 3B vs Claude Haiku 3Anthropic · ECI 118.4
- Ministral 14B vs Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed
- Ministral 14B vs Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol
