Ministral 3 14B vs GPT-5-Codex vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast comes out ahead, 71 to 63 and 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AIMinistral 3 14B
63/100- ECI—
- Price$0.268 / $0.325
- Context262K
OpenAIGPT-5-Codex
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.1 Fast
71/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context2M
Grok 4.1 Fast is our pick
Grok 4.1 Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Ministral 3 14B (63) and GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on context window. GPT-5-Codex wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.1 Fast $0.275 · Ministral 3 14B $0.282 · GPT-5-Codex $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.1 Fast 2,000,000 · GPT-5-Codex 400,000 · Ministral 3 14B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMinistral 3 14B: Text, Images · GPT-5-Codex: Text, Images · Grok 4.1 Fast: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMinistral 3 14BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 3 14B | GPT-5-Codex | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 76 | 24 | 76 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 70 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 44 | 72 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 42/100 | 71/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ministral 3 14BMistral AI | GPT-5-CodexOpenAI | Grok 4.1 FastxAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.268 | $1.25 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $0.325 (best) | $10.00 | $0.50 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.282 | $3.44 | $0.275 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 3 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 400,000 tokens | 2,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 30,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 3 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Dec 2, 2025 | Sep 15, 2025 | Nov 19, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 30, 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ministral 3 14B$3.33
- GPT-5-Codex$32.50
- Grok 4.1 Fast$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 3 14B, GPT-5-Codex or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Ministral 3 14B (63) and GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on context window. GPT-5-Codex wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B, GPT-5-Codex or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Ministral 3 14B costs $0.268 input / $0.325 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); GPT-5-Codex costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.275 per million tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast versus $0.282 for Ministral 3 14B (1× as much) and $3.44 for GPT-5-Codex (12× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ministral 3 14B has not been scored yet, GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet and Grok 4.1 Fast has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 3 14B, GPT-5-Codex and Grok 4.1 Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.1 Fast has the largest context window at 2,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5-Codex and 262,144 for Ministral 3 14B. Maximum output per response: Ministral 3 14B up to 262,144, GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000, Grok 4.1 Fast up to 30,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 3 14B accepts text and images; GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images; Grok 4.1 Fast accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Ministral 3 14B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-5-Codex and Grok 4.1 Fast is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Ministral 3 14B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Grok 4.1 Fast came out Nov 19, 2025; GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
