ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Ministral 14B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Trinity Mini

Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 65 and 64 on our weighted score, though Trinity Mini is 2.8× cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Ministral 14B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.20
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Lite

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.089 / $0.534
    • Context256K
  3. Arcee AI

    Trinity Mini

    Released Dec 1, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.045 / $0.15
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and Ministral 14B (64). It leads on inputs & features. Trinity Mini wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceTrinity MiniTrinity Mini $0.071 · Ministral 14B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 14BMinistral 14B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Trinity Mini 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteMinistral 14B: Text, Images · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Trinity Mini: Text
  • Self-hostingMinistral 14B and Trinity MiniPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0 and OpenMDW-1.1)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMinistral 14BSeed 2.0 LiteTrinity Mini
Price50%8383100
Inputs & features30%508035
Context window20%373624
Overall100%64/10073/10065/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Ministral 14B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Trinity Mini specifications side by side
SpecificationMinistral 14BMistral AISeed 2.0 LiteByteDance SeedTrinity MiniArcee AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20$0.089$0.045 (best)
Output$0.20$0.534$0.15 (best)
Cached input—$0.018—
Blended (3:1)$0.20$0.20$0.071 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $0.134 / $0.802Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output262,144 tokens (best)32,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0ProprietaryOpenOpenMDW-1.1
API model ID—doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428—
API providers16 (best)1
ReleasedDec 2, 2025Feb 14, 2026Dec 1, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Ministral 14B$2.40
  • Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
  • Trinity Mini$0.75
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Trinity Mini?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and Ministral 14B (64). It leads on inputs & features. Trinity Mini wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Trinity Mini?

Trinity Mini is cheaper at $0.045 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Ministral 14B costs $0.20 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.071 per million tokens for Trinity Mini versus $0.20 for Ministral 14B (2.8× as much) and $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (2.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ministral 14B has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Trinity Mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite and Trinity Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 14B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite and 131,072 for Trinity Mini. Maximum output per response: Ministral 14B up to 262,144, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Trinity Mini up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Ministral 14B accepts text and images; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Trinity Mini accepts text. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Ministral 14B and Trinity Mini publishes its weights (Apache-2.0 and OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Ministral 14B came out Dec 2, 2025; Trinity Mini came out Dec 1, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.