Ministral 14B vs Seed 2.0 Lite vs Solar Pro 3
Seed 2.0 Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 64 and 55 on our weighted score.
Mistral AIMinistral 14B
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.20
- Context262K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context131K
Seed 2.0 Lite is our pick
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Ministral 14B (64) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMinistral 14BMinistral 14B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 · Solar Pro 3 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 14BMinistral 14B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Solar Pro 3 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteMinistral 14B: Text, Images · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video · Solar Pro 3: Text
- Self-hostingMinistral 14BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Ministral 14B | Seed 2.0 Lite | Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 83 | 78 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 73/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Ministral 14BMistral AI | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed | Solar Pro 3Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.089 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.20 (best) | $0.534 | $0.25 |
| Cached input | — | $0.018 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.20 (best) | $0.20 | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 | solar-pro3 |
| API providers | 1 | 6 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Dec 2, 2025 | Feb 14, 2026 | Jan 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Ministral 14B$2.40
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
- Solar Pro 3$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Solar Pro 3?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Ministral 14B (64) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite or Solar Pro 3?
Ministral 14B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); Solar Pro 3 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Ministral 14B versus $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (1× as much) and $0.25 for Solar Pro 3 (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Ministral 14B has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Ministral 14B, Seed 2.0 Lite and Solar Pro 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 14B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite and 131,072 for Solar Pro 3. Maximum output per response: Ministral 14B up to 262,144, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000, Solar Pro 3 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Ministral 14B accepts text and images; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video; Solar Pro 3 accepts text. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Ministral 14B publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite and Solar Pro 3 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Lite is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Solar Pro 3 came out Jan 2026; Ministral 14B came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 3 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
