MiniMax-M3 vs Inkling Small
Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 70, MiniMax-M3 69). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MiniMax
MiniMax-M3
69/100- ECI147.0
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context1.05M
Thinking Machines
Inkling Small
70/100- ECI150.2
- Price$0.50 / $1.20
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, MiniMax-M3 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability and MiniMax-M3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityInkling SmallCapabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 · MiniMax-M3 147.0
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M3MiniMax-M3 $0.525 · Inkling Small $0.675 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameMiniMax-M3 1,048,576 · Inkling Small 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiniMax-M3: Text, Images, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M3 | Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 74 | 78 |
| Price | 25% | 63 | 58 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 70/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 147.0 | 150.2 (best) |
| ECI rank | #62 of 148 | #47 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 90.9% (best) | 88.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 71.1% | 90.0% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 19.1% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.06 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 (best) | $0.675 |
| Long-context rate | Over 512K: $0.60 / $2.40 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Median of 11 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 512,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M3 | — |
| API providers | 42 (best) | 11 |
| Released | Jun 1, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
MiniMax-M3$5.40
Inkling Small$7.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M3 or Inkling Small?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, MiniMax-M3 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Inkling Small for raw capability and MiniMax-M3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Inkling Small?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Inkling Small costs $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for MiniMax-M3 versus $0.675 for Inkling Small (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Inkling Small scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Inkling Small 150.2 (#47 of 148) and MiniMax-M3 147.0 (#62 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (147.5–152.1 vs 142.7–149.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — MiniMax-M3 90.9%, Inkling Small 88.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Inkling Small 90.0%, MiniMax-M3 71.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M3 and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Inkling Small leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 and Inkling Small share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M3 up to 512,000, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M3 accepts text, images and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. MiniMax-M3 came out Jun 1, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.