ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3-VL Plus

Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 56 to 51 and 48 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 Coder Next is 18% cheaper per token.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2

    Released Oct 27, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context205K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Coder Next

    Released Feb 3, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  3. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Coder Next $0.45 · MiniMax-M2 $0.525 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3-VL PlusQwen3 Coder Next 262,144 · Qwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · MiniMax-M2 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3-VL PlusMiniMax-M2: Text · Qwen3 Coder Next: Text · Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMiniMax-M2 and Qwen3 Coder NextPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax-M2Qwen3 Coder NextQwen3-VL Plus
Price50%636662
Inputs & features30%353560
Context window20%323737
Overall100%48/10051/10056/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3-VL Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax-M2MiniMaxQwen3 Coder NextAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30$0.20 (best)$0.20 (best)
Output$1.20 (best)$1.20 (best)$1.60
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.525$0.45 (best)$0.55
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIMedian of 11 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window204,800 tokens262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDMiniMax-M2—qwen3-vl-plus
API providers13 (best)116
ReleasedOct 27, 2025Feb 3, 2026Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Sep 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax-M2$5.40
  • Qwen3 Coder Next$4.40
  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax-M2, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3-VL Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). MiniMax-M2 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 (1.2× as much) and $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2 has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Coder Next has not been scored yet and Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2, Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3-VL Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3-VL Plus have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2 up to 131,072, Qwen3 Coder Next up to 65,536, Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax-M2 accepts text; Qwen3 Coder Next accepts text; Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images. Qwen3-VL Plus handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3 Coder Next publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3-VL Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the newest, released Feb 3, 2026. MiniMax-M2 came out Oct 27, 2025; Qwen3-VL Plus came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Next Sep 2025, Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.