MiniMax-M2 Her vs Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3.6 27B comes out ahead, 56 to 51 and 45 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 Coder Next is 3× cheaper per token.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2 Her
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context66K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6 27B
56/100- ECI146.5
- Price$0.60 / $3.60
- Context262K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 Coder Next
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.20
- Context262K
Qwen3.6 27B is our pick
Qwen3.6 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 Her (45). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Coder Next $0.45 · MiniMax-M2 Her $0.525 · Qwen3.6 27B $1.35 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder NextQwen3.6 27B 262,144 · Qwen3 Coder Next 262,144 · MiniMax-M2 Her 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.6 27BMiniMax-M2 Her: Text · Qwen3.6 27B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen3 Coder Next: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder NextPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2 Her | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 63 | 44 | 66 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 56/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax | Qwen3.6 27BAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 Coder NextAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 146.5 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #68 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 85.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 91.1% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.30 | $0.60 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $1.20 (best) | $3.60 | $1.20 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.525 | $1.35 | $0.45 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official Alibaba API | Median of 11 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 2,048 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | qwen3.6-27b | — |
| API providers | 4 | 27 (best) | 11 |
| Released | Jan 23, 2026 | Apr 22, 2026 | Feb 3, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Sep 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2 Her$5.40
- Qwen3.6 27B$13.20
- Qwen3 Coder Next$4.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2 Her, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3.6 27B is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 Her (45). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 Her, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). MiniMax-M2 Her costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers); Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.60 input / $3.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 Her (1.2× as much) and $1.35 for Qwen3.6 27B (3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2 Her has not been scored yet, Qwen3.6 27B has an ECI of 146.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2 Her, Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 65,536 for MiniMax-M2 Her. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2 Her up to 2,048, Qwen3.6 27B up to 65,536, Qwen3 Coder Next up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2 Her accepts text; Qwen3.6 27B accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen3 Coder Next accepts text. Qwen3.6 27B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiniMax-M2 Her is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.6 27B is the newest, released Apr 22, 2026. Qwen3 Coder Next came out Feb 3, 2026; MiniMax-M2 Her came out Jan 23, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Next Sep 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
