ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.40
    • Context205K
  2. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.445 / $2.23
    • Context256K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.40 / $3.20
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.1 Turbo on price and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.1 TurboSeed 2.1 Turbo $0.891 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Seed 2.1 Turbo 256,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · Seed 2.1 Turbo: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedSeed 2.1 TurboQwen3.5 122B-A10B
Price50%495248
Inputs & features30%358090
Context window20%323637
Overall100%41/10057/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedQwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60$0.445$0.40 (best)
Output$2.40$2.23 (best)$3.20
Cached input$0.06 (best)$0.089—
Blended (3:1)$1.05$0.891 (best)$1.10
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial Volcengine Ark APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window204,800 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDMiniMax-M2.7-highspeeddoubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628qwen3.5-122b-a10b
API providers14419 (best)
ReleasedMar 18, 2026Jun 23, 2026Feb 23, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
  • Seed 2.1 Turbo$8.91
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Seed 2.1 Turbo 57/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Seed 2.1 Turbo on price and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Seed 2.1 Turbo or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is cheaper at $0.445 input / $2.23 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.891 per million tokens for Seed 2.1 Turbo versus $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (1.2× as much) and $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet, Seed 2.1 Turbo has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Seed 2.1 Turbo and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Turbo and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.1 Turbo up to 256,000, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.