ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Step 5 Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58, Step 5 Preview 57, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.40
    • Context205K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.40 / $3.20
    • Context262K
  3. StepFun

    Step 5 Preview

    Released Sep 16, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $2.70
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Step 5 Preview 57/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed on price and Step 5 Preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 · Step 5 Preview $1.43 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextStep 5 PreviewStep 5 Preview 1,000,000 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Step 5 Preview: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedQwen3.5 122B-A10BStep 5 Preview
Price50%494843
Inputs & features30%359080
Context window20%323760
Overall100%41/10058/10057/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Step 5 Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxQwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60$0.40 (best)$1.00
Output$2.40 (best)$3.20$2.70
Cached input$0.06—$0.05 (best)
Blended (3:1)$1.05 (best)$1.10$1.43
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial StepFun (Global) API
Limits
Context window204,800 tokens262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens65,536 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYeslow · medium · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedqwen3.5-122b-a10bstep-5-preview
API providers1419 (best)7
ReleasedMar 18, 2026Feb 23, 2026Sep 16, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
  • Step 5 Preview$15.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Step 5 Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 58/100, Step 5 Preview 57/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed on price and Step 5 Preview for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Step 5 Preview?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 input / $2.70 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed versus $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1× as much) and $1.43 for Step 5 Preview (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and Step 5 Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Step 5 Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, Step 5 Preview up to 1,000,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video; Step 5 Preview accepts text, images and video. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Step 5 Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Step 5 Preview is the newest, released Sep 16, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.