MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs North Mini Code vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
North Mini Code comes out ahead, 71 to 58 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
- Our pick
CohereNorth Mini Code
71/100- ECI—
- PriceFree / Free
- Context256K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $3.20
- Context262K
North Mini Code is our pick
North Mini Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (58) and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on price. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNorth Mini CodeNorth Mini Code Free · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · North Mini Code 256,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · North Mini Code: Text · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | North Mini Code | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 100 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 36 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 71/100 | 58/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax | North Mini CodeCohere | Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | Free (best) | $0.40 |
| Output | $2.40 | Free (best) | $3.20 |
| Cached input | $0.06 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | Free (best) | $1.10 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Cohere API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeshigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | north-mini-code-1-0 | qwen3.5-122b-a10b |
| API providers | 14 | 2 | 19 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 | Feb 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 23, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
- North Mini CodeFree
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, North Mini Code or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?
North Mini Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (58) and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on price. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, North Mini Code or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?
North Mini Code is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). North Mini Code is listed as free.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet, North Mini Code has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, North Mini Code and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for North Mini Code and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, North Mini Code up to 64,000, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; North Mini Code accepts text; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images, audio and video. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
North Mini Code is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: North Mini Code Sep 23, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
