ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (MiniMax-M3 65, Qwen3.7 Plus 65, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.40
    • Context205K
    Full specs Remove MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed

  2. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M3

    Released Jun 1, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI147.0
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove MiniMax-M3

  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Plus
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiniMax-M3 65/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 65/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M3 on price and MiniMax-M3 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiniMax-M3MiniMax-M3 $0.525 · Qwen3.7 Plus $0.70 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiniMax-M3MiniMax-M3 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 PlusMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · MiniMax-M3: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and MiniMax-M3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M3Qwen3.7 Plus
Price50%496357
Inputs & features30%357080
Context window20%326160
Overall100%41/10065/10065/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxMiniMax-M3MiniMaxQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—147.0147.4 (best)
ECI rank—#62 of 148#61 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—90.9% (best)87.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics——34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—71.1%93.3% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60$0.30 (best)$0.40
Output$2.40$1.20 (best)$1.60
Cached input$0.06$0.06$0.04 (best)
Blended (3:1)$1.05$0.525 (best)$0.70
Long-context rateSame rateOver 512K: $0.60 / $2.40Over 256K: $1.20 / $4.80
Price sourceOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window204,800 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens512,000 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M3qwen3.7-plus
API providers1442 (best)25
ReleasedMar 18, 2026Jun 1, 2026Jun 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
  • MiniMax-M3$5.40
  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, MiniMax-M3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiniMax-M3 65/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 65/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiniMax-M3 on price and MiniMax-M3 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, MiniMax-M3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for MiniMax-M3 versus $0.70 for Qwen3.7 Plus (1.3× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet, MiniMax-M3 has an ECI of 147.0 and Qwen3.7 Plus has an ECI of 147.4.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed, MiniMax-M3 and Qwen3.7 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M3 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, MiniMax-M3 up to 512,000, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; MiniMax-M3 accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video. MiniMax-M3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and MiniMax-M3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.7 Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the newest, released Jun 2, 2026. MiniMax-M3 came out Jun 1, 2026; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons