MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
LongCat-2.5-Preview comes out ahead, 52 to 41 on our weighted score, though MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is 19% cheaper per token.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
- Our pick
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.5-Preview
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
LongCat-2.5-Preview is our pick
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLongCat-2.5-PreviewLongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsLongCat-2.5-PreviewMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | LongCat-2.5-Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 44 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 52/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax | LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.60 (best) | $0.75 |
| Output | $2.40 (best) | $2.95 |
| Cached input | $0.06 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 (best) | $1.30 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | — |
| API providers | 14 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
- LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed or LongCat-2.5-Preview?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (41). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed or LongCat-2.5-Preview?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is cheaper at $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.05 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.5-Preview (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet and LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and LongCat-2.5-Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
LongCat-2.5-Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images. LongCat-2.5-Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3.5 122B-A10BThree-way comparison
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Grok Build 0.1xAI
- LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Step 5 PreviewStepFun
- LongCat-2.5-Preview vs Hy4 previewTencent
