MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 Code vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 comes out ahead, 61 to 57 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
- Our pick
Mistral AIVoxtral Mini 3B 2507
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.04 / $0.04
- Context33K
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is our pick
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Seed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Seed 2.0 Code | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 51 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 37 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 57/100 | 61/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.475 | $0.04 (best) |
| Output | $2.40 | $2.37 | $0.04 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.06 (best) | $0.095 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | $0.95 | $0.04 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | — |
| API providers | 7 | 10 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Feb 13, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is cheaper at $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (24× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (26× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Code is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
