MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 Code vs Trendyol Asure 12B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed 2.0 Code 57, Trendyol Asure 12B 54, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Seed 2.0 Code 57/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price and Seed 2.0 Code for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Seed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and Trendyol Asure 12BPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Seed 2.0 Code | Trendyol Asure 12B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 51 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 57/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.475 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $2.40 | $2.37 | $0.50 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.06 (best) | $0.095 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | $0.95 | $0.20 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | OpenGemma |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | — |
| API providers | 7 | 10 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 13, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Trendyol Asure 12B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Seed 2.0 Code 57/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price and Seed 2.0 Code for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (4.7× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (5.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code and Trendyol Asure 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and Trendyol Asure 12B publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Seed 2.0 Code came out Feb 14, 2026; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
