MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 Code vs Seed 2.0 Mini
Seed 2.0 Mini comes out ahead, 80 to 57 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
- Our pickByteDance Seed
Seed 2.0 Mini
80/100- ECI—
- Price$0.03 / $0.297
- Context256K
Seed 2.0 Mini is our pick
Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 2.0 MiniSeed 2.0 Mini $0.097 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Mini 256,000 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.0 MiniMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Seed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Seed 2.0 Mini: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Seed 2.0 Code | Seed 2.0 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 51 | 98 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 37 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 57/100 | 80/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.475 | $0.03 (best) |
| Output | $2.40 | $2.37 | $0.297 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.06 | $0.095 | $0.0059 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | $0.95 | $0.097 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Over 32K: $0.059 / $0.594 |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | doubao-seed-2-0-mini-260428 |
| API providers | 7 | 10 (best) | 8 |
| Released | Feb 13, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Seed 2.0 Mini$0.891
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.0 Mini?
Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code or Seed 2.0 Mini?
Seed 2.0 Mini is cheaper at $0.03 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.097 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Mini versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (9.8× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (11× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Seed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.0 Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Mini and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, Seed 2.0 Mini up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Seed 2.0 Mini accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code and Seed 2.0 Mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Code is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Seed 2.0 Mini came out Feb 14, 2026; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
