MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Nova 2 Lite vs Seed 2.0 Code
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 57 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MiniMax
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
- Our pick
Amazon
Nova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
ByteDance Seed
Seed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite $0.935 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · Seed 2.0 Code 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Seed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Nova 2 Lite | Seed 2.0 Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 49 | 51 | 51 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 41/100 | 62/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.33 (best) | $0.475 |
| Output | $2.40 | $2.75 | $2.37 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.06 (best) | $0.083 | $0.095 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.05 | $0.935 (best) | $0.95 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 |
| Price source | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 |
| API providers | 7 | 2 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Feb 13, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Oct 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
Nova 2 Lite$8.80
Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Nova 2 Lite or Seed 2.0 Code?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Nova 2 Lite or Seed 2.0 Code?
Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.935 per million tokens for Nova 2 Lite versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (1× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, Nova 2 Lite and Seed 2.0 Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Seed 2.0 Code and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536, Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite and Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Code is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; Nova 2 Lite came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.