ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2

Too close to call on our weighted score (MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41, DeepSeek OCR 2 32). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed

    Released Feb 13, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.40
    • Context205K
  2. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed

    Released Mar 18, 2026

    41/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $2.40
    • Context205K
  3. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek OCR 2

    Released Jan 27, 2026

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.89 / $1.47
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsDeepSeek OCR 2MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedDeepSeek OCR 2
Price50%494949
Inputs & features30%353525
Context window20%32320
Overall100%41/10041/10032/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2 specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxDeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.60 (best)$0.60 (best)$0.89
Output$2.40$2.40$1.47 (best)
Cached input$0.06$0.06—
Blended (3:1)$1.05$1.05$1.03 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window204,800 tokens (best)204,800 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model IDMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed—
API providers714 (best)2
ReleasedFeb 13, 2026Mar 18, 2026Jan 27, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
  • MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
  • DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed or DeepSeek OCR 2?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 41/100, DeepSeek OCR 2 32/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek OCR 2 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed or DeepSeek OCR 2?

DeepSeek OCR 2 is cheaper at $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.03 per million tokens for DeepSeek OCR 2 versus $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (1× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet and DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed and DeepSeek OCR 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed have the largest context windows (204,800 and 204,800 tokens), against 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images. DeepSeek OCR 2 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is the newest, released Mar 18, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.