ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Viv Fast

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash comes out ahead, 79 to 75 and 53 on our weighted score, though Viv Fast is 14% cheaper per token.

  1. OpenBMB

    MiniCPM5-2B

    Released Sep 6, 2026

    53/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.124 / $0.743
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

    Released Sep 17, 2026

    79/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.47
    • Context1M
  3. Vivgrid

    Viv Fast

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.13 / $0.40
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is our pick

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Viv Fast (75) and MiniCPM5-2B (53). It leads on inputs & features. Viv Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceViv FastViv Fast $0.198 · Qwen3.8 Omni Flash $0.23 · MiniCPM5-2B $0.279 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3.8 Omni Flash and Viv FastQwen3.8 Omni Flash 1,000,000 · Viv Fast 1,000,000 · MiniCPM5-2B 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 Omni FlashMiniCPM5-2B: Text · Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Viv Fast: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMiniCPM5-2BPublishes downloadable weights (apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiniCPM5-2BQwen3.8 Omni FlashViv Fast
Price50%768083
Inputs & features30%359070
Context window20%246060
Overall100%53/10079/10075/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Viv Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationMiniCPM5-2BOpenBMBQwen3.8 Omni FlashAlibaba (Qwen)Viv FastVivgrid
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.124 (best)$0.15$0.13
Output$0.743$0.47$0.40 (best)
Cached input—$0.016 (best)$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.279$0.23$0.198 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Vivgrid API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · xhighYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenapache-2.0ProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—qwen3.8-omni-flashviv-fast
API providers110 (best)1
ReleasedSep 6, 2026Sep 17, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiniCPM5-2B$2.73
  • Qwen3.8 Omni Flash$2.44
  • Viv Fast$2.10
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiniCPM5-2B, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Viv Fast?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Viv Fast (75) and MiniCPM5-2B (53). It leads on inputs & features. Viv Fast wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiniCPM5-2B, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Viv Fast?

Viv Fast is cheaper at $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.15 input / $0.47 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); MiniCPM5-2B costs $0.124 input / $0.743 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.198 per million tokens for Viv Fast versus $0.23 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash (1.2× as much) and $0.279 for MiniCPM5-2B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiniCPM5-2B has not been scored yet, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has not been scored yet and Viv Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiniCPM5-2B, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Viv Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Viv Fast have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 131,072 for MiniCPM5-2B. Maximum output per response: MiniCPM5-2B up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash up to 131,072, Viv Fast up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiniCPM5-2B accepts text; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash accepts text, images, audio and video; Viv Fast accepts text and images. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiniCPM5-2B publishes its weights (apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and Viv Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Viv Fast is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash came out Sep 17, 2026; MiniCPM5-2B came out Sep 6, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Viv Fast Sep 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.