MiMo-V2-Omni vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
MiMo-V2-Omni comes out ahead, 77 to 73 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Omni
77/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context262K
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $1.50
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2-Omni is our pick
MiMo-V2-Omni is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (73). It leads on price. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-OmniMiMo-V2-Omni $0.175 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2-Omni 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2-Omni: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Omni | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 86 | 62 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 90 | 100 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 77/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-OmniXiaomi | Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.14 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.28 (best) | $1.50 |
| Cached input | $0.0028 (best) | $0.025 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.563 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | mimo-v2-omni | gemini-3.1-flash-lite |
| API providers | 2 | 23 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | May 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Omni$1.96
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Omni or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (73). It leads on price. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Omni versus $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (3.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2-Omni has not been scored yet and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Omni and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for MiMo-V2-Omni. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Omni up to 131,072, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Omni accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. MiMo-V2-Omni and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the newest, released May 7, 2026. MiMo-V2-Omni came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Omni Dec 2024, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Step 3.5 Flash 2603Three-way comparison
- MiMo-V2-Omni vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- MiMo-V2-Omni vs Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol
- MiMo-V2-Omni vs Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed
- MiMo-V2-Omni vs GLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce
