ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiMo-V2-Flash vs GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Devstral Small 2

Devstral Small 2 comes out ahead, 67 to 61 and 61 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Flash

    Released Dec 16, 2025Deprecated

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context262K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.7-FlashX

    Released Jan 19, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.40
    • Context200K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Devstral Small 2

    Released Dec 9, 2025

    67/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Devstral Small 2 is our pick

Devstral Small 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-4.7-FlashX (61) and MiMo-V2-Flash (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDevstral Small 2Devstral Small 2 $0.15 · GLM-4.7-FlashX $0.152 · MiMo-V2-Flash $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2-Flash and Devstral Small 2MiMo-V2-Flash 262,144 · Devstral Small 2 262,144 · GLM-4.7-FlashX 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsDevstral Small 2MiMo-V2-Flash: Text · GLM-4.7-FlashX: Text · Devstral Small 2: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiMo-V2-FlashGLM-4.7-FlashXDevstral Small 2
Price50%868989
Inputs & features30%353550
Context window20%373237
Overall100%61/10061/10067/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiMo-V2-Flash vs GLM-4.7-FlashX vs Devstral Small 2 specifications side by side
SpecificationMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiGLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu)Devstral Small 2Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.14$0.07 (best)$0.10
Output$0.28 (best)$0.40$0.30
Cached input$0.0028 (best)$0.01—
Blended (3:1)$0.175$0.152$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Xiaomi APIOfficial Z.AI APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)200,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpenApache-2.0
API model IDmimo-v2-flashglm-4.7-flashx—
API providers38 (best)1
ReleasedDec 16, 2025Jan 19, 2026Dec 9, 2025
Knowledge cutoffDec 1, 2024Apr 2025Dec 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiMo-V2-Flash$1.96
  • GLM-4.7-FlashX$1.50
  • Devstral Small 2$1.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiMo-V2-Flash, GLM-4.7-FlashX or Devstral Small 2?

Devstral Small 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-4.7-FlashX (61) and MiMo-V2-Flash (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash, GLM-4.7-FlashX or Devstral Small 2?

Devstral Small 2 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Devstral Small 2 versus $0.152 for GLM-4.7-FlashX (1× as much) and $0.175 for MiMo-V2-Flash (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2-Flash has not been scored yet, GLM-4.7-FlashX has not been scored yet and Devstral Small 2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Flash, GLM-4.7-FlashX and Devstral Small 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash and Devstral Small 2 have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 200,000 for GLM-4.7-FlashX. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Flash up to 65,536, GLM-4.7-FlashX up to 131,072, Devstral Small 2 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts text; GLM-4.7-FlashX accepts text; Devstral Small 2 accepts text and images. Devstral Small 2 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

GLM-4.7-FlashX is the newest, released Jan 19, 2026. MiMo-V2-Flash came out Dec 16, 2025; Devstral Small 2 came out Dec 9, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Flash Dec 1, 2024, GLM-4.7-FlashX Apr 2025, Devstral Small 2 Dec 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.