ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen 3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime 42). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$4.35 / $8.70
    • Context1.05M
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen 3.8 Max Prime

    Released Sep 23, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$4.00 / $12.00
    • Context1M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max Preview

    Released Jul 19, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47/100, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44/100, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max Preview on price and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $5.44 · Qwen 3.8 Max Prime $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Qwen 3.8 Max Prime 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen 3.8 Max Prime: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedQwen 3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max Preview
Price50%151327
Inputs & features30%808070
Context window20%616060
Overall100%44/10042/10047/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen 3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomiQwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$4.35$4.00$2.00 (best)
Output$8.70$12.00$6.00 (best)
Cached input$0.036——
Blended (3:1)$5.44$6.00$3.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Xiaomi APIMedian of 4 providersMedian of 6 providers
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesYesYes
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDmimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed——
API providers9 (best)46
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Sep 23, 2026Jul 19, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed$60.90
  • Qwen 3.8 Max Prime$64.00
  • Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Qwen3.8 Max Preview 47/100, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 44/100, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max Preview on price and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?

Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 input / $8.70 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Qwen 3.8 Max Prime costs $4.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Max Preview versus $5.44 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (1.8× as much) and $6.00 for Qwen 3.8 Max Prime (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime and Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen 3.8 Max Prime and 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max Preview. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072, Qwen 3.8 Max Prime up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen 3.8 Max Prime accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen 3.8 Max Prime and Qwen3.8 Max Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen 3.8 Max Prime is the newest, released Sep 23, 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed came out Sep 21, 2026; Qwen3.8 Max Preview came out Jul 19, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.