MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B comes out ahead, 59 to 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
44/100- ECI—
- Price$4.35 / $8.70
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.70
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is our pick
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (44). It leads on price. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceOrnith 1.5 35B A3BOrnith 1.5 35B A3B $0.575 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $5.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1,048,576 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed | Ornith 1.5 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 15 | 61 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 44/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedXiaomi | Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $4.35 | $0.20 (best) |
| Output | $8.70 | $1.70 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.036 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $5.44 | $0.575 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.6-pro-ultraspeed | — |
| API providers | 9 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | Aug 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed$60.90
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Ornith 1.5 35B A3B?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (44). It leads on price. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Ornith 1.5 35B A3B?
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.70 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 input / $8.70 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.575 per million tokens for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B versus $5.44 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed (9.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has not been scored yet and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed accepts text, images, audio and video; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B accepts text and images. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Ornith 1.5 35B A3B came out Aug 18, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeThree-way comparison
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen 3.8 Max PrimeAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs ParetoUnbiased
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Command A PlusCohere
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4Upstage
