MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes out ahead, 79 to 67 and 59 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-Flash
79/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1.05M
- Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
67/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
DeepReinforce
Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.70
- Context262K
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is our pick
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro (67) and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (59). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.175 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.544 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B $0.575 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1,048,576 · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Ornith 1.5 35B A3B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Ornith 1.5 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 86 | 62 | 61 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 61 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 79/100 | 67/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi | MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi | Ornith 1.5 35B A3BDeepReinforce |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.14 (best) | $0.435 | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.28 (best) | $0.87 | $1.70 |
| Cached input | $0.0028 (best) | $0.0036 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.544 | $0.575 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official Xiaomi API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.6-flash | mimo-v2.6-pro | — |
| API providers | 18 (best) | 16 | 2 |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 | Aug 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash$1.96
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro$6.09
- Ornith 1.5 35B A3B$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.6-Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Ornith 1.5 35B A3B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro (67) and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (59). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Ornith 1.5 35B A3B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Ornith 1.5 35B A3B costs $0.20 input / $1.70 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.6-Flash versus $0.544 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro (3.1× as much) and $0.575 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B (3.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.6-Pro has not been scored yet and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 262,144 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.6-Flash up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.6-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio and video; MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts text, images, audio and video; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B accepts text and images. MiMo-V2.6-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. MiMo-V2.6-Pro came out Sep 22, 2026; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B came out Aug 18, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
