MiMo-V2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5 comes out ahead, 79 to 69 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5
79/100- ECI—
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1.05M
NVIDIANemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
69/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.85
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2.5 is our pick
MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (69). It leads on price and context window. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5 $0.175 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5 1,048,576 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2.5: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 86 | 69 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 79/100 | 69/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.14 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.28 (best) | $0.85 |
| Cached input | $0.0028 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.40 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.5 | nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning |
| API providers | 21 (best) | 8 |
| Released | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.5$1.96
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning?
MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (69). It leads on price and context window. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5 versus $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (2.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2.5 has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5 up to 131,072, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.5 accepts text, images, audio and video; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the newest, released Apr 28, 2026. MiMo-V2.5 came out Apr 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5 Dec 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Step 3.5 Flash 2603Three-way comparison
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Seed CharacterByteDance Seed
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol
- MiMo-V2.5 vs Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
