ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Viv Fast

Too close to call on our weighted score (MiMo-V2.5 79, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79, Viv Fast 75). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.5

    Released Apr 22, 2026

    79/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context1.05M
  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.6-Flash

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    79/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context1.05M
  3. Vivgrid

    Viv Fast

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.13 / $0.40
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiMo-V2.5 79/100, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79/100, Viv Fast 75/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiMo-V2.5 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.5 $0.175 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.175 · Viv Fast $0.198 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.5 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1,048,576 · Viv Fast 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-FlashMiMo-V2.5: Text, Images, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Viv Fast: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-FlashPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.6-FlashViv Fast
Price50%868683
Inputs & features30%808070
Context window20%616160
Overall100%79/10079/10075/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Viv Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationMiMo-V2.5XiaomiMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomiViv FastVivgrid
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.14$0.14$0.13 (best)
Output$0.28 (best)$0.28 (best)$0.40
Cached input$0.0028 (best)$0.0028 (best)$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.175 (best)$0.175 (best)$0.198
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Xiaomi APIOfficial Xiaomi APIOfficial Vivgrid API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesYesNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningYesYesYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDmimo-v2.5mimo-v2.6-flashviv-fast
API providers21 (best)181
ReleasedApr 22, 2026Sep 22, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoffDec 2024—Sep 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • MiMo-V2.5$1.96
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash$1.96
  • Viv Fast$2.10
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: MiMo-V2.5, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Viv Fast?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (MiMo-V2.5 79/100, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 79/100, Viv Fast 75/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: MiMo-V2.5 on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Viv Fast?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Viv Fast costs $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for MiMo-V2.5 versus $0.175 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash (1× as much) and $0.198 for Viv Fast (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2.5 has not been scored yet, MiMo-V2.6-Flash has not been scored yet and Viv Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5, MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Viv Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Viv Fast. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5 up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.6-Flash up to 131,072, Viv Fast up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

MiMo-V2.5 accepts text, images, audio and video; MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio and video; Viv Fast accepts text and images. MiMo-V2.5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Viv Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. Viv Fast came out Sep 21, 2026; MiMo-V2.5 came out Apr 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5 Dec 2024, Viv Fast Sep 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.