MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 comes out ahead, 62 to 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
XiaomiMiMo-V2.5-Pro
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.435 / $0.87
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is our pick
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on price. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceStep 3.5 Flash 2603Step 3.5 Flash 2603 $0.15 · MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.544 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2.5-ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro 1,048,576 · Step 3.5 Flash 2603 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2.5-Pro: Text · Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi | Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.435 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.87 | $0.30 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.0036 (best) | $0.02 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.544 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Xiaomi API | Official StepFun (Global) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | mimo-v2.5-pro | step-3.5-flash-2603 |
| API providers | 20 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro$6.09
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603$1.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Step 3.5 Flash 2603?
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro (54). It leads on price. MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Step 3.5 Flash 2603?
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Step 3.5 Flash 2603 versus $0.544 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro (3.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has not been scored yet and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 256,000 for Step 3.5 Flash 2603. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2.5-Pro up to 131,072, Step 3.5 Flash 2603 up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts text; Step 3.5 Flash 2603 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the newest, released Apr 22, 2026. Step 3.5 Flash 2603 came out Apr 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2.5-Pro Dec 2024, Step 3.5 Flash 2603 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteThree-way comparison
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIA
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Solar Pro 4Upstage
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle
