Mercury Edit 2 vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed comes out ahead, 41 to 35 on our weighted score, though Mercury Edit 2 is 2.8× cheaper per token.
InceptionMercury Edit 2
35/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.75
- Context32K
- Our pick
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is our pick
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Mercury Edit 2 (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mercury Edit 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMercury Edit 2Mercury Edit 2 $0.375 · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed 204,800 · Mercury Edit 2 32,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMercury Edit 2: Text · MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.7-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Mercury Edit 2 | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 70 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Mercury Edit 2Inception | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $0.75 (best) | $2.40 |
| Cached input | $0.025 (best) | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.375 (best) | $1.05 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Inception API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,000 tokens | 204,800 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | mercury-edit-2 | MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed |
| API providers | 1 | 14 (best) |
| Released | Mar 30, 2026 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Mercury Edit 2$4.00
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Mercury Edit 2 or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 41/100 against Mercury Edit 2 (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Mercury Edit 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Mercury Edit 2 or MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed?
Mercury Edit 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (official Inception API price). MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.375 per million tokens for Mercury Edit 2 versus $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed (2.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Mercury Edit 2 has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mercury Edit 2 and MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Mercury Edit 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 32,000 for Mercury Edit 2. Maximum output per response: Mercury Edit 2 up to 8,192, MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Mercury Edit 2 accepts text; MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mercury Edit 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mercury Edit 2 is the newest, released Mar 30, 2026. MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed came out Mar 18, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Trinity Large ThinkingThree-way comparison
- Mercury Edit 2 vs Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
- Mercury Edit 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA
- Mercury Edit 2 vs Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
- Mercury Edit 2 vs Seed 1.8ByteDance Seed
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
