ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mercury 2.5 vs Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mercury 2.5 71, Laguna S 2.1 69, Laguna XS 2.1 68). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Inception

    Mercury 2.5

    Released Sep 8, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.04 / $0.15
    • Context260K
  2. Poolside

    Laguna S 2.1

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context1.05M
  3. Poolside

    Laguna XS 2.1

    Released Jul 2, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.06 / $0.12
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mercury 2.5 71/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100, Laguna XS 2.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mercury 2.5 on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMercury 2.5Mercury 2.5 $0.068 · Laguna XS 2.1 $0.075 · Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · Laguna XS 2.1 262,144 · Mercury 2.5 260,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsMercury 2.5: Text · Laguna S 2.1: Text · Laguna XS 2.1: Text
  • Self-hostingLaguna S 2.1 and Laguna XS 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMercury 2.5Laguna S 2.1Laguna XS 2.1
Price50%10093100
Inputs & features30%453535
Context window20%366137
Overall100%71/10069/10068/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mercury 2.5 vs Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationMercury 2.5InceptionLaguna S 2.1PoolsideLaguna XS 2.1Poolside
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.04 (best)$0.10$0.06
Output$0.15$0.20$0.12 (best)
Cached input$0.004——
Blended (3:1)$0.068 (best)$0.125$0.075
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Inception APIMedian of 4 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window260,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDmercury-2.5poolside/laguna-s-2.1poolside/laguna-xs-2.1
API providers16 (best)4
ReleasedSep 8, 2026Jul 21, 2026Jul 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoffNov 1, 2025——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mercury 2.5$0.70
  • Laguna S 2.1$1.40
  • Laguna XS 2.1$0.84
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mercury 2.5, Laguna S 2.1 or Laguna XS 2.1?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Mercury 2.5 71/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100, Laguna XS 2.1 68/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mercury 2.5 on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2.5, Laguna S 2.1 or Laguna XS 2.1?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper at $0.04 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Inception API price). Laguna XS 2.1 costs $0.06 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Poolside); Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.068 per million tokens for Mercury 2.5 versus $0.075 for Laguna XS 2.1 (1.1× as much) and $0.125 for Laguna S 2.1 (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Mercury 2.5 has not been scored yet, Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet and Laguna XS 2.1 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mercury 2.5, Laguna S 2.1 and Laguna XS 2.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Laguna XS 2.1 and 260,000 for Mercury 2.5. Maximum output per response: Mercury 2.5 up to 65,536, Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768, Laguna XS 2.1 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mercury 2.5 accepts text; Laguna S 2.1 accepts text; Laguna XS 2.1 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Laguna S 2.1 and Laguna XS 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mercury 2.5 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mercury 2.5 is the newest, released Sep 8, 2026. Laguna S 2.1 came out Jul 21, 2026; Laguna XS 2.1 came out Jul 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Mercury 2.5 Nov 1, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.