ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Magistral Medium vs o1-pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Too close to call on our weighted score (Magistral Medium 30, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28, o1-pro 27). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Magistral Medium

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $5.00
    • Context128K
  2. OpenAI

    o1-pro

    Released Mar 19, 2025Deprecated

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$150.00 / $600.00
    • Context200K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Magistral Medium 30/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100, o1-pro 27/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Magistral Medium on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · o1-pro $262.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · o1-pro 200,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputso1-proMagistral Medium: Text · o1-pro: Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMagistral Mediumo1-proQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%29027
Inputs & features30%357025
Context window20%243237
Overall100%30/10027/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Magistral Medium vs o1-pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMagistral MediumMistral AIo1-proOpenAIQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$150.00$1.50 (best)
Output$5.00 (best)$600.00$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$2.75 (best)$262.50$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens100,000 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · highNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDmagistral-medium-latesto1-proqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers457 (best)
ReleasedMar 17, 2025Mar 19, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 2025Sep 2023Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Magistral Medium$30.00
  • o1-pro$2,700
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Magistral Medium, o1-pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Magistral Medium 30/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100, o1-pro 27/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Magistral Medium on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium, o1-pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); o1-pro costs $150.00 input / $600.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much) and $262.50 for o1-pro (95× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Magistral Medium has not been scored yet, o1-pro has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Magistral Medium, o1-pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for o1-pro and 128,000 for Magistral Medium. Maximum output per response: Magistral Medium up to 16,384, o1-pro up to 100,000, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Magistral Medium accepts text; o1-pro accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. o1-pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium and o1-pro is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 2025. o1-pro came out Mar 19, 2025; Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, o1-pro Sep 2023, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.