Magistral Medium vs GPT-5.1 Chat
GPT-5.1 Chat comes out ahead, 38 to 30 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 20% cheaper per token.
Mistral AIMagistral Medium
30/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $5.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Chat
38/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5.1 Chat is our pick
GPT-5.1 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 38/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · GPT-5.1 Chat $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameMagistral Medium 128,000 · GPT-5.1 Chat 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-5.1 ChatMagistral Medium: Text · GPT-5.1 Chat: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Magistral Medium | GPT-5.1 Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 29 | 24 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 30/100 | 38/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Magistral MediumMistral AI | GPT-5.1 ChatOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $1.25 (best) |
| Output | $5.00 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.75 (best) | $3.44 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | magistral-medium-latest | — |
| API providers | 4 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Mar 17, 2025 | Nov 13, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2025 | Sep 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Magistral Medium$30.00
- GPT-5.1 Chat$32.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Magistral Medium or GPT-5.1 Chat?
GPT-5.1 Chat is the better all-round choice, scoring 38/100 against Magistral Medium (30). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or GPT-5.1 Chat?
Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). GPT-5.1 Chat costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.44 for GPT-5.1 Chat (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and GPT-5.1 Chat has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Magistral Medium and GPT-5.1 Chat yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Magistral Medium and GPT-5.1 Chat share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Magistral Medium up to 16,384, GPT-5.1 Chat up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Magistral Medium accepts text; GPT-5.1 Chat accepts text and images. GPT-5.1 Chat handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Magistral Medium and GPT-5.1 Chat are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.1 Chat is the newest, released Nov 13, 2025. Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, GPT-5.1 Chat Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructThree-way comparison
- Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Magistral Medium vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Magistral Medium vs Command ACohere
- Magistral Medium vs Palmyra X5Writer
- GPT-5.1 Chat vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogle
- GPT-5.1 Chat vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
