ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Magistral Medium vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview comes out ahead, 35 to 30 and 28 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 20% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Magistral Medium

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $5.00
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Magistral Medium 128,000 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewMagistral Medium: Text · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMagistral MediumGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%292427
Inputs & features30%356025
Context window20%242437
Overall100%30/10035/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Magistral Medium vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMagistral MediumMistral AIGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$1.25 (best)$1.50
Output$5.00 (best)$10.00$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$2.75 (best)$3.44$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Over 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Google APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens64,000 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDmagistral-medium-latestgemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers427 (best)
ReleasedMar 17, 2025Oct 7, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoffJun 2025Jan 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Magistral Medium$30.00
  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Magistral Medium, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much) and $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Magistral Medium has not been scored yet, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Magistral Medium, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Magistral Medium and 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: Magistral Medium up to 16,384, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Magistral Medium accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Magistral Medium and Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025; Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Magistral Medium Jun 2025, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.