LongCat-2.0 vs Motif 3
Too close to call on our weighted score (LongCat-2.0 45, Motif 3 44). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.0
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
Motif Technologies
Motif 3
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (LongCat-2.0 45/100, Motif 3 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Motif 3 on price and LongCat-2.0 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMotif 3Motif 3 $0.875 · LongCat-2.0 $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLongCat-2.0LongCat-2.0 1,000,000 · Motif 3 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLongCat-2.0: Text · Motif 3: Text
- Self-hostingMotif 3Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | LongCat-2.0 | Motif 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 44 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat) | Motif 3Motif Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.75 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $2.95 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.015 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.30 | $0.875 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official LongCat API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | LongCat-2.0 | — |
| API providers | 5 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jun 30, 2026 | Aug 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- LongCat-2.0$13.40
- Motif 3$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: LongCat-2.0 or Motif 3?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (LongCat-2.0 45/100, Motif 3 44/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Motif 3 on price and LongCat-2.0 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, LongCat-2.0 or Motif 3?
Motif 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). LongCat-2.0 costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (official LongCat API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Motif 3 versus $1.30 for LongCat-2.0 (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. LongCat-2.0 has not been scored yet and Motif 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for LongCat-2.0 and Motif 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
LongCat-2.0 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Motif 3. Maximum output per response: LongCat-2.0 up to 131,072, Motif 3 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
LongCat-2.0 accepts text; Motif 3 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Motif 3 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.0 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Motif 3 is the newest, released Aug 7, 2026. LongCat-2.0 came out Jun 30, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
