LongCat-2.0 vs Hy4 preview vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 comes out ahead, 54 to 45 and 45 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Meituan (LongCat)LongCat-2.0
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.75 / $2.95
- Context1M
TencentHy4 preview
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.834 / $2.50
- Context1.02M
- Our pick
xAIGrok Build 0.1
54/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $2.00
- Context256K
Grok Build 0.1 is our pick
Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Hy4 preview (45) and LongCat-2.0 (45). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGrok Build 0.1Grok Build 0.1 $1.25 · Hy4 preview $1.25 · LongCat-2.0 $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · LongCat-2.0 1,000,000 · Grok Build 0.1 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok Build 0.1LongCat-2.0: Text · Hy4 preview: Text · Grok Build 0.1: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingHy4 previewPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | LongCat-2.0 | Hy4 preview | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 44 | 45 | 45 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 60 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 45/100 | 45/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | LongCat-2.0Meituan (LongCat) | Hy4 previewTencent | Grok Build 0.1xAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.75 (best) | $0.834 | $1.00 |
| Output | $2.95 | $2.50 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.015 (best) | $0.042 | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.30 | $1.25 | $1.25 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.00 / $4.00 |
| Price source | Official LongCat API | Official Tencent TokenHub API | Official xAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,024,000 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 64,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeshigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | LongCat-2.0 | hy4-preview | grok-build-0.1 |
| API providers | 5 | 13 | 19 (best) |
| Released | Jun 30, 2026 | Aug 28, 2026 | Apr 16, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- LongCat-2.0$13.40
- Hy4 preview$13.34
- Grok Build 0.1$14.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: LongCat-2.0, Hy4 preview or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Hy4 preview (45) and LongCat-2.0 (45). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, LongCat-2.0, Hy4 preview or Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Hy4 preview costs $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price); LongCat-2.0 costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (official LongCat API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Grok Build 0.1 versus $1.25 for Hy4 preview (1× as much) and $1.30 for LongCat-2.0 (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. LongCat-2.0 has not been scored yet, Hy4 preview has not been scored yet and Grok Build 0.1 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for LongCat-2.0, Hy4 preview and Grok Build 0.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for LongCat-2.0 and 256,000 for Grok Build 0.1. Maximum output per response: LongCat-2.0 up to 131,072, Hy4 preview up to 64,000, Grok Build 0.1 up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
LongCat-2.0 accepts text; Hy4 preview accepts text; Grok Build 0.1 accepts text, images and PDFs. Grok Build 0.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy4 preview publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; LongCat-2.0 and Grok Build 0.1 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Hy4 preview is the newest, released Aug 28, 2026. LongCat-2.0 came out Jun 30, 2026; Grok Build 0.1 came out Apr 16, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
