ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Qwen Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 50, Qwen Turbo 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Turbo

    Released Nov 1, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.05 / $0.20
    • Context1M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 50/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for raw capability and Qwen Turbo on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructShared benchmarks: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 29.8% · Qwen Turbo 24.0%
  • Lowest priceQwen TurboQwen Turbo $0.087 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Qwen Turbo 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Qwen Turbo: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructQwen Turbo
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%3024
Price25%72100
Inputs & features15%5035
Context window10%10060
Overall100%50/10048/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Qwen Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaQwen TurboAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)129.7—
ECI rank#126 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions51.8% (best)41.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.8% (best)6.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.225$0.05 (best)
Output$0.69$0.20 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.341$0.087 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window10,000,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID—qwen-turbo
API providers4 (best)3
ReleasedApr 5, 2025Nov 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
  • Qwen Turbo$0.90
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Qwen Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 50/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct for raw capability and Qwen Turbo on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Qwen Turbo versus $0.341 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (3.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 29.8% and Qwen Turbo 24.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, Qwen Turbo 41.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, Qwen Turbo 6.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen Turbo. Maximum output per response: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Qwen Turbo accepts text. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. Qwen Turbo came out Nov 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.