ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Claude Haiku 3

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
    Full specs Remove Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  2. Anthropic

    Claude Haiku 3

    Released Mar 13, 2024

    47/100
    • ECI118.4
    • Price$0.25 / $1.25
    • Context200K
    Full specs Remove Claude Haiku 3

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47). It leads on capability, price and context window. Claude Haiku 3 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 · Claude Haiku 3 118.4
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · Claude Haiku 3 $0.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Claude Haiku 3 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsClaude Haiku 3Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Claude Haiku 3: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructClaude Haiku 3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5238
Price25%7264
Inputs & features15%5060
Context window10%10032
Overall100%62/10047/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Claude Haiku 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMetaClaude Haiku 3Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)129.7 (best)118.4
ECI rank#126 of 148 (best)#143 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions51.8% (best)36.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.8% (best)1.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.225 (best)$0.25
Output$0.69 (best)$1.25
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.341 (best)$0.50
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 4 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window10,000,000 tokens (best)200,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID——
API providers4 (best)2
ReleasedApr 5, 2025Mar 13, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Aug 31, 2023
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
  • Claude Haiku 3$5.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Claude Haiku 3?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Claude Haiku 3 (47). It leads on capability, price and context window. Claude Haiku 3 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct or Claude Haiku 3?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). Claude Haiku 3 costs $0.25 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.341 per million tokens for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct versus $0.50 for Claude Haiku 3 (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148) and Claude Haiku 3 118.4 (#143 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (124.8–131.4 vs 110.5–121.2), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, Claude Haiku 3 36.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, Claude Haiku 3 1.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct and Claude Haiku 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 3. Maximum output per response: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Claude Haiku 3 up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Claude Haiku 3 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Haiku 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Haiku 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. Claude Haiku 3 came out Mar 13, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024, Claude Haiku 3 Aug 31, 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons