ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 58 to 53 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI132.2
    • Price$0.321 / $0.91
    • Context1M
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on price and context window. Mistral Medium 3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMistral Medium 3Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 · Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 132.2
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct $0.468 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 1,000,000 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct: Text, Images · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMistral Medium 3
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5658
Price25%6654
Inputs & features15%5050
Context window10%6024
Overall100%58/10053/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMetaMistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)132.2134.1 (best)
ECI rank#122 of 148#117 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions67.0% (best)59.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics20.6%32.2% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.321 (best)$0.40
Output$0.91 (best)$2.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.468 (best)$0.80
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 6 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID—mistral-medium-2505
API providers6 (best)5
ReleasedApr 5, 2025May 7, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024May 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct$5.03
  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on price and context window. Mistral Medium 3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.321 input / $0.91 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.468 per million tokens for Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148) and Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 132.2 (#122 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (130.5–135.6 vs 128.0–134.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 67.0%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Medium 3 32.2%, Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 20.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Medium 3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct up to 16,384, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct accepts text and images; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct Aug 2024, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.