ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Solar Pro 2

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 comes out ahead, 60 to 52 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

    Released Apr 7, 2025Deprecated

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  2. Upstage

    Solar Pro 2

    Released May 20, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.25
    • Context66K
    Full specs Remove Solar Pro 2

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is our pick

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 $0.15 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 131,072 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1Solar Pro 2
Price50%8978
Inputs & features30%3535
Context window20%2412
Overall100%60/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 vs Solar Pro 2 specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1NVIDIASolar Pro 2Upstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.25
Output$0.15 (best)$0.25
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.25
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Upstage API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesminimal · high
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDnvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1solar-pro2
API providers22
ReleasedApr 7, 2025May 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Mar 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1$1.80
  • Solar Pro 2$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Solar Pro 2?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 or Solar Pro 2?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider; free on Nvidia). Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 versus $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 up to 131,072, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Solar Pro 2 is the newest, released May 20, 2025. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 came out Apr 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons