Llama-3.2-1B vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen-VL OCR
Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 8B Instruct 57, Llama-3.2-1B 55, Qwen-VL OCR 36). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MetaLlama-3.2-1B
55/100- ECI102.0
- Price$0.064 / $0.15
- Context131K
Mistral AIMinistral 8B Instruct
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL OCR
36/100- ECI—
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context34K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Ministral 8B Instruct 57/100, Llama-3.2-1B 55/100, Qwen-VL OCR 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Llama-3.2-1B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLlama-3.2-1BLlama-3.2-1B $0.085 · Ministral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Qwen-VL OCR $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B InstructLlama-3.2-1B 131,072 · Ministral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRLlama-3.2-1B: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text · Qwen-VL OCR: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License and Mistral Research License)
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.2-1B | Ministral 8B Instruct | Qwen-VL OCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 89 | 57 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 1 |
| Overall | 100% | 55/100 | 57/100 | 36/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-1BMeta | Ministral 8B InstructMistral AI | Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 102.0 | — | — |
| ECI rank | #147 of 148 | — | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 23.9% | 27.2% (best) | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 0.6% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.064 (best) | $0.15 | $0.72 |
| Output | $0.15 | $0.15 (best) | $0.72 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.085 (best) | $0.15 | $0.72 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 34,096 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License | OpenMistral Research License | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | qwen-vl-ocr |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Sep 25, 2024 | Oct 16, 2024 | Oct 28, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | — | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.2-1B$0.936
- Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
- Qwen-VL OCR$8.64
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen-VL OCR?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Ministral 8B Instruct 57/100, Llama-3.2-1B 55/100, Qwen-VL OCR 36/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Llama-3.2-1B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct or Qwen-VL OCR?
Llama-3.2-1B is cheaper at $0.064 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Ministral 8B Instruct costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Qwen-VL OCR costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.085 per million tokens for Llama-3.2-1B versus $0.15 for Ministral 8B Instruct (1.8× as much) and $0.72 for Qwen-VL OCR (8.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.2-1B has an ECI of 102.0, Ministral 8B Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct and Qwen-VL OCR yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-1B and Qwen-VL OCR does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B Instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-1B up to 8,192, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.2-1B accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B Instruct publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License and Mistral Research License) and can be self-hosted; Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen-VL OCR is the newest, released Oct 28, 2024. Ministral 8B Instruct came out Oct 16, 2024; Llama-3.2-1B came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-1B Dec 2023, Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Llama-3.2-1B vs Qwen2.5-Coder-0.5BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 88.2
- Llama-3.2-1B vs Nova LiteAmazon
- Llama-3.2-1B vs Command R7BCohere
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.6
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Gemma 3 4B ITGoogle · ECI 116.1
- Ministral 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
