ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Llama-3.2-1B vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Pixtral 12B

Pixtral 12B comes out ahead, 64 to 57 and 55 on our weighted score, though Llama-3.2-1B is 43% cheaper per token.

  1. Meta

    Llama-3.2-1B

    Released Sep 25, 2024

    55/100
    • ECI102.0
    • Price$0.064 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 8B Instruct

    Released Oct 16, 2024

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Mistral AI

    Pixtral 12B

    Released Sep 1, 2024

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Pixtral 12B is our pick

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (57) and Llama-3.2-1B (55). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.2-1B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceLlama-3.2-1BLlama-3.2-1B $0.085 · Ministral 8B Instruct $0.15 · Pixtral 12B $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B InstructLlama-3.2-1B 131,072 · Ministral 8B Instruct 131,072 · Pixtral 12B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsPixtral 12BLlama-3.2-1B: Text · Ministral 8B Instruct: Text · Pixtral 12B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightLlama-3.2-1BMinistral 8B InstructPixtral 12B
Price50%1008989
Inputs & features30%02550
Context window20%242424
Overall100%55/10057/10064/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Llama-3.2-1B vs Ministral 8B Instruct vs Pixtral 12B specifications side by side
SpecificationLlama-3.2-1BMetaMinistral 8B InstructMistral AIPixtral 12BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)102.0——
ECI rank#147 of 148——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions23.9%27.2% (best)—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics0.6%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.064 (best)$0.15$0.15
Output$0.15$0.15 (best)$0.15 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.085 (best)$0.15$0.15
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 1 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenLlama 3.2 Community LicenseOpenMistral Research LicenseOpen
API model ID——pixtral-12b
API providers214 (best)
ReleasedSep 25, 2024Oct 16, 2024Sep 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffDec 2023—Sep 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Llama-3.2-1B$0.936
  • Ministral 8B Instruct$1.80
  • Pixtral 12B$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct or Pixtral 12B?

Pixtral 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Ministral 8B Instruct (57) and Llama-3.2-1B (55). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.2-1B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct or Pixtral 12B?

Llama-3.2-1B is cheaper at $0.064 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Ministral 8B Instruct costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Pixtral 12B costs $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.085 per million tokens for Llama-3.2-1B versus $0.15 for Ministral 8B Instruct (1.8× as much) and $0.15 for Pixtral 12B (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.2-1B has an ECI of 102.0, Ministral 8B Instruct has not been scored yet and Pixtral 12B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-1B, Ministral 8B Instruct and Pixtral 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-1B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama-3.2-1B and Ministral 8B Instruct have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Pixtral 12B. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-1B up to 8,192, Ministral 8B Instruct up to 8,192, Pixtral 12B up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Llama-3.2-1B accepts text; Ministral 8B Instruct accepts text; Pixtral 12B accepts text and images. Pixtral 12B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Llama 3.2 Community License and Mistral Research License), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Ministral 8B Instruct is the newest, released Oct 16, 2024. Llama-3.2-1B came out Sep 25, 2024; Pixtral 12B came out Sep 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-1B Dec 2023, Pixtral 12B Sep 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.