Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct vs Muse Glimmer 30B vs Command R
Too close to call on our weighted score (Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 58, Muse Glimmer 30B 57, Command R 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.
MetaLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.197 / $0.51
- Context128K
- Meta
Muse Glimmer 30B
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context131K
CohereCommand R
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 58/100, Muse Glimmer 30B 57/100, Command R 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R on price and Muse Glimmer 30B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceCommand RCommand R $0.263 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct $0.275 · Muse Glimmer 30B $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMuse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B 131,072 · Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 128,000 · Command R 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct and Muse Glimmer 30BLlama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct: Text, Images · Muse Glimmer 30B: Text, Images · Command R: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct | Muse Glimmer 30B | Command R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 76 | 63 | 77 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 70 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 57/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | Command RCohere |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.197 | $0.30 | $0.15 (best) |
| Output | $0.51 (best) | $1.20 | $0.60 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.275 | $0.525 | $0.263 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 10 providers | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | command-r-08-2024 |
| API providers | 2 | 12 (best) | 5 |
| Released | Sep 25, 2024 | Aug 10, 2026 | Aug 30, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Jan 4, 2026 | Jun 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct$2.99
- Muse Glimmer 30B$5.40
- Command R$2.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Muse Glimmer 30B or Command R?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct 58/100, Muse Glimmer 30B 57/100, Command R 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Command R on price and Muse Glimmer 30B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Muse Glimmer 30B or Command R?
Command R is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct costs $0.197 input / $0.51 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for Command R versus $0.275 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct (1× as much) and $0.525 for Muse Glimmer 30B (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct has not been scored yet, Muse Glimmer 30B has not been scored yet and Command R has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, Muse Glimmer 30B and Command R yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Glimmer 30B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct and 128,000 for Command R. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct up to 4,096, Muse Glimmer 30B up to 131,072, Command R up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct accepts text and images; Muse Glimmer 30B accepts text and images; Command R accepts text. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Muse Glimmer 30B is the newest, released Aug 10, 2026. Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct came out Sep 25, 2024; Command R came out Aug 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct Dec 2023, Muse Glimmer 30B Jan 4, 2026, Command R Jun 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
